All Slots Casino: Operator Profile

All Slots Casino is one of the longest-running brands in online gambling, and it still accepts registrations from New Zealand. This page is a factual profile of the operator behind that brand. It is not a review, it carries no ranking or score, it contains no offer or sign-up link, and it does not link to the casino. The single most important point appears at the top rather than buried at the bottom: two long-established, independent industry databases currently publish warnings about this operator, and both give the same reason — doubts about whether winnings are actually paid out.

The box below is a snapshot of the facts covered in detail further down. Treat it as a starting point rather than a verdict. Several entries are marked as reported because reputable databases do not fully agree on them, and where sources disagree, the disagreement is itself the finding.

Who operates All Slots Casino

“All Slots” is a trading name — a brand under which a company does business. The name dates to around 2000, when the site launched as a pokies-led casino on Microgaming software; a few databases record 2002. A brand that old ought to have a settled corporate history, but the identity of the company standing behind it today is less clear than you would expect.

The brand is not the company. This matters because it is the operating company — not the words “All Slots” — that you would be dealing with in any dispute over an account or a withdrawal. Reputable independent databases do not agree on which company that is. AskGamblers lists the operating company as Digimedia Limited; Latest Casino Bonuses (LCB) describes the platform as owned by Baytree (Alderney) Limited. The casino’s own banking pages have in recent months attributed deposits to Baytree Interactive. Where the public record is this inconsistent, the only reliable answer is the entity named in the footer of the operator’s current site, and even that should be treated as a claim to be checked rather than a fact.

It belongs to a group, and terms apply across the group. All Slots sits within the Fortune Lounge family of casinos alongside several sister sites. That is not a neutral detail. Withdrawal limits at Fortune Lounge brands are calculated across the group’s sites collectively, which means opening accounts at several of them does not raise the amount you can take out in a given week — the ceiling is shared.

Management changed, and the warnings date from that change. Independent sources attribute the casino’s current handling to Buffalo Partners, and it is that change, rather than the brand’s long history, that the warnings below point to.

The licences are offshore, not local. The two regulators most consistently reported for this brand are the Kahnawake Gaming Commission (a licensing body based in the Mohawk Territory of Kahnawake, Canada) and the Alderney Gambling Control Commission (based in the Channel Islands). Some older database entries also mention the Malta Gaming Authority. A licence from any of these authorities governs the operator in that jurisdiction; none of them has authority over a New Zealand consumer complaint, and none is a New Zealand authorisation. Whichever regulator and company actually apply, a licence number taken from a casino footer should always be checked against that regulator’s own public register rather than taken on trust.

What independent sources say

The warnings on this operator are reported here, not adjudicated by this site. What gives them weight is that they come from sources independent of the operator, several of which have been running for many years, and that the serious ones reach the same conclusion for the same reason.

Wizard of Odds places All Slots Casino on its blacklist. Its note states that the casino was once considered reputable but has “declined significantly under Buffalo Partners management,” cites “reports of non-payment and aggressive business practices” and “a high risk of unpaid winnings,” and advises players to steer clear. It describes Buffalo Partners as a “predatory management group.”

Latest Casino Bonuses (LCB) carries a warning headed plainly that the casino “has a warning.” It records that players have had trouble, dates a change to Buffalo Partners management, notes that affiliates have reported non-payment and heavy-handed business tactics, and does not recommend the brand.

Casino Guru takes a more measured line: it does not blacklist the casino outright and rates it above average overall, but it flags a number of clauses in the terms and conditions that it considers unfair. Unfair clauses matter because they are the mechanism by which a withheld payout can be justified after the fact — the time to read them is before a deposit, not after a win.

AskGamblers keeps a running complaint record. It logs dozens of player complaints, a majority of them in the payment category, and reports that the average complaint here takes markedly longer to resolve than the average across the operators it tracks. It also notes the games are independently tested for fairness by eCOGRA. That last point is worth keeping in view: the dispute around this operator is about payout practices and contract terms, not about whether the games themselves are rigged.

What the serious warnings share is that none of them is about the games, the software or the size of the lobby. All are about whether money comes back out, and all date the problem to the change in management rather than to the brand’s age. You can read each source for yourself — the links are in the reference section at the foot of this page. If you are weighing any operator, our guide to how to spot and avoid scam casinos sets out the warning signs to look for.

The withdrawal terms that decide a payout

The term most worth understanding before anything else is the withdrawal limit, because it is unusual in a specific way: the ceiling is not a flat figure that applies to everyone. It engages precisely when your winnings pass a multiple of what you put in.

According to Wizard of Odds, a weekly cashout limit of around €4,000 applies to players who win five times or more their total deposits. Read that trigger again: a cap that kicks in at five times deposits is a cap that kicks in exactly in the situation where a payout would matter most. A run of modest deposits followed by one large win is the exact shape it catches. The limit is calculated across the Fortune Lounge group collectively, not this one brand, so spreading play across sister sites does not get around it.

A worked example makes the effect concrete. A NZ$50,000 win against a modest deposit history does not arrive as a single NZ$50,000 payment. At roughly €4,000 a week it arrives in instalments over many months, and the remainder sits in a gambling account the whole time — where it stays available to bet. Our page on casino withdrawal times in New Zealand explains why money held in a playable balance is not the same thing as money paid out.

Two further mechanics commonly extend the wait:

Identity verification (KYC). Before a first withdrawal, operators typically require “know your customer” checks — proof of identity, address and payment method. This is standard and lawful, but at operators with a poor payout reputation it is also a recurring source of delay in player reports, with documents requested and re-requested at the point of cashout.

Reverse withdrawal. Some sites offer a function that lets a pending payout be pulled back into a playable balance during the processing period. Combined with a multi-day pending window, it is a design that makes it easy to gamble winnings back before they ever leave the account. Whether a site offers this is one of the first things worth checking.

On the legal side in New Zealand, the Fair Trading Act 1986 prohibits unfair terms in standard-form consumer contracts, and the Commerce Commission can apply to the courts for a declaration that a specific term is unfair and therefore unenforceable. Whether any particular withdrawal cap or forfeiture clause meets that test is a matter for the courts, not for this site. What is not in doubt is that you should know the figure before you deposit rather than discover it after you win.

Games and software

The library is built predominantly on Microgaming and Games Global content — the source of the “All Slots” name, since the site launched as a pokies-led casino and the emphasis has stayed there. Alongside pokies there are software-based table games such as blackjack and roulette, video poker variants, and a live-dealer lobby streamed from a third-party studio. The games themselves are independently audited for fairness, as noted above, so the points below are about reading a game library in general rather than about any specific fault with this one.

Game counts are a measure of breadth, not quality. A lobby of 700 or 900 titles tells you how much choice there is, not what the games return. Return to player (RTP) — the long-run percentage of stakes a game is designed to pay back — is set per game and is checkable in each game’s own information panel.

The return depends on the specific version. A game bearing a familiar name can return very different amounts depending on its paytable. Our guide to video poker in New Zealand shows how a single title can pay anywhere from about 95% to over 99% depending on which pay schedule the operator has loaded. The headline name on the tile tells you almost nothing about this.

Live and table games count differently towards bonuses. When a welcome offer is active, wagering contributions on live-dealer and table games are commonly cut to between 10% and 20% of the stake, which multiplies the effective playthrough requirement several times over compared with pokies. If you intend to clear a bonus, the game you choose changes the maths substantially.

Bonuses, and how they measure against New Zealand’s rules

Historic welcome offers at this operator have been structured as multi-part deposit matches — a percentage match applied across each of the first several deposits — with wagering requirements reported in the 30x to 50x range and a maximum-bet restriction while bonus funds are in play. The following are observations about how such offers work, not a description of any current promotion.

The maximum-bet rule is the term that most often costs players their winnings. While wagering is still outstanding, placing a single stake above the bonus’s maximum-bet limit — even once, even by accident — can void the bonus and any winnings derived from it under the terms. It typically surfaces only at withdrawal, when the operator reviews the play history. A wagering requirement expressed as “35x the bonus” also means the bonus must be bet through thirty-five times before any of it can be withdrawn, which is a larger commitment than the headline match suggests.

A multi-part welcome package of this kind has no lawful equivalent in New Zealand’s licensed market. Under the Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026, the value of an inducement from a licensed operator is tightly capped: where a customer does not have to spend their own money to receive it, the inducement cannot exceed NZ$100; where the customer must deposit or bet to receive it, the value is capped at the lesser of NZ$100 or 200% of that deposit or bet. A stacked, four-figure match across several deposits sits well outside that limit. Our guide to casino bonuses in New Zealand works through the cap and the terms in full.

Where this operator stands under New Zealand’s 2026 rules

New Zealand’s first licensing regime for online casinos began with the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026, which came into force on 1 May 2026, followed by the Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 from 3 July 2026. The system is run by the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA), and it is being introduced in stages.

Because All Slots was serving New Zealand players before the regime began, it falls within the transitional arrangements and may continue operating here until 1 December 2026. From that date, any operator that has not applied for a licence must stop serving New Zealand customers. An operator with an application still under consideration may keep going, but without advertising, until a decision is made.

Whether this operator has applied is not publicly known. The DIA has not published the list of applicants, and the maths is stark: up to 15 licences are available, set against several hundred sites that currently accept New Zealand players. Most of those sites will not be on the register. Until the licensing process concludes and the regime is fully operational in 2027, no operator can accurately be described as licensed in New Zealand, and the DIA is direct about the consequence — players using unlicensed platforms will not have the same protections. Our New Zealand gambling laws guide sets out the full timeline and what changes at each stage.

What to check for yourself

Rather than relying on this or any other profile, four things are verifiable directly and take only a few minutes:

• The operating entity and registration number in the site’s footer. This tells you which company you would actually be contracting with.
• The licence number, checked on the regulator’s own public register — not read from the footer and taken on trust.
• The withdrawal terms: the minimum, the maximum, and any weekly or monthly cap, including whether it is calculated across a group of sites.
• Whether the site offers a reverse-withdrawal function, which lets a pending payout be cancelled back into a playable balance.

Our casino reviews hub explains the full checklist and how to read ranking and “top casino” pages critically, including the ones that earn commission from the operators they rank.

Disclaimer. This page is published for information only. It is not financial, legal or gambling advice, and nothing on it is a recommendation to gamble or an endorsement of any operator. You must be 18 or older to gamble online in New Zealand. No link on this page goes to an operator’s cashier, and none will — reach any casino by typing its address yourself. Player accounts and database warnings described here are individual reports rather than findings of fact. Licensing, ownership, bonus terms, withdrawal limits and country availability all change, sometimes within weeks, and this page covers a period in which the New Zealand market is being restructured; confirm the current position in the operator’s own terms and on the regulator’s own register before acting on anything here. Free, confidential help is available in New Zealand from the Gambling Helpline on 0800 654 655, or by free text to 8006, 24 hours a day; PGF Services offers free counselling on 0800 664 262, and support is available to whānau and friends as well as to players.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is All Slots Casino licensed in New Zealand?

No, and no operator currently is. New Zealand’s licensing regime is being introduced in stages, with the register of licensed operators expected once the process concludes and the regime is fully operational in 2027. The brand holds offshore registrations — most consistently reported as Kahnawake and Alderney, with Malta cited in some older listings — but none of these is a New Zealand authorisation or gives a New Zealand player local protections.

Do independent sources rate this casino well?

No. Wizard of Odds blacklists it, reporting that the casino has declined under Buffalo Partners management, describing that group as predatory and warning of a high risk of unpaid winnings. Latest Casino Bonuses (LCB) also publishes a warning and does not recommend the brand. Casino Guru does not blacklist it but flags several contract clauses it regards as unfair. All of these sources are independent of the operator.

Is there a limit on how much I can withdraw?

Yes, and it is significant. Wizard of Odds reports a weekly cashout limit of around €4,000 that applies specifically where a player wins five times or more their total deposits, calculated across all casinos in the Fortune Lounge group. In practice this means a large win is paid in instalments over an extended period rather than as a single lump sum.

How long do withdrawals take?

Beyond the weekly cap, expect a pending period before approval (reported at roughly 24 to 48 hours), then additional processing time — typically faster for e-wallets than for cards or bank transfers. Identity verification is normally required before a first payout and can add further delay. Member comments on independent databases are mixed, with some reporting smooth cashouts and others describing slow or difficult ones.

Does this site recommend All Slots Casino?

No. This page describes an operator; it does not recommend one. CasinoChecking.nz publishes no rankings, scores, offers or sign-up links on this page, and it does not link to the casino. If gambling is causing you or someone you know harm, free and confidential help is available from the Gambling Helpline on 0800 654 655 or by free text to 8006, 24 hours a day.